Making Effective Decisions example answer: a full EO walkthrough (2026)

Making Effective Decisions is the most-searched Civil Service behaviour, and most example answers published online share the same fault: they are written to sound impressive rather than to hit the markers a sifter is scoring against. This walkthrough does it the other way round. The real markers first, then a realistic answer that fails against them, then the same answer rebuilt from the same facts.

One thing before we start: both example answers below are composites we wrote for illustration. They are not from a real application, and copying them into yours would be spotted and would not fit your facts anyway. The method is the takeaway.

The marking key: Making Effective Decisions at EO

The framework defines this behaviour as using evidence and knowledge to support accurate decisions, weighing alternative options, implications and risks. At Executive Officer (EO) grade, the markers a sifter holds are:

Read those again before writing anything. Notice what they ask for: responsibility, research, consultation, explained reasoning, weighed options. Not seniority, not drama, not a heroic outcome. A modest example that shows all five beats an impressive one that shows two.

The before answer

Here is the kind of answer capable people write every day. The question: "Describe a time you made an effective decision. (250 words)"

In my role as a customer service adviser, our team was struggling with long waiting times on the phones. Morale was low and customers were unhappy. It was a difficult period and something needed to change. We agreed that the rota was not working, as too many staff were on breaks at the busiest times. I suggested changing the rota so that breaks were staggered differently. This was implemented and it made a real difference. Waiting times improved and the team was much happier. My manager praised the change and it is still used today. This shows I can make effective decisions under pressure.

It reads fine. It is honest, it has a real improvement in it, and it would score poorly. Against the five EO markers:

Two partials out of five. The frustrating part is that the writer almost certainly has everything the missing markers need. They lived this. They just did not write it down.

The questions that rescue it

This is the step most guides skip. The gap between the before answer and a strong one is not writing talent, it is a handful of questions that surface detail the writer already has:

What did you look at before suggesting the change? (The rota itself? Call volumes? For how far back?) Who did you speak to before deciding? What other options did you consider and why did you reject them? How did you explain the change to the team and your manager? And what actually changed, roughly, in numbers?

Answering those from memory takes ten minutes. This is exactly the loop Application Coach runs automatically: it scores your draft against the markers for your grade, asks the follow-up questions for the gaps it finds, and rewrites using only what you tell it.

The after answer

Same person, same events, plus the surfaced detail. About 250 words, in STAR shape (situation, task, action, result):

As a customer service adviser, I noticed our average call waiting times had roughly doubled over two months, and complaints about waiting were rising. Our team leader asked for suggestions, and I took it on.

Rather than guess, I pulled the rota and the call volume reports for the previous three months and compared them. The data showed our two busiest hours each day overlapped with the periods when the most staff were on breaks. I checked the complaint log, which pointed at the same two windows.

I considered two options: asking for extra staff, which had a cost and a long lead time, or restaggering breaks within the existing team, which cost nothing but affected colleagues' routines. I spoke to our team leader and to a colleague who had run the previous rota, to understand why breaks were set as they were and whether a change would create problems elsewhere, including for two part-time colleagues with fixed caring commitments, whose hours I kept unchanged.

I decided on restaggered breaks, wrote a short note for my manager setting out the data and my reasons, and explained the change at the team meeting so everyone knew why it was happening.

Within a month, waiting times in the two peak hours fell by around a third and complaints about waiting dropped. The rota pattern is still in use.

Against the same markers:

Four hits and a partial, from the same underlying story. And note what the rewrite did not do: it added no invented achievements, no inflated title, no drama. Every new sentence is detail the writer already had, surfaced by the questions. That is the honesty line that matters, both because sifters probe examples at interview and because the point of the application is to get a job you can actually do.

Budgeting 250 words

The after answer spends its words roughly like this: two sentences of situation, one of task, then the large middle on action, and a short concrete result. If your draft spends its first hundred words describing the organisation and the difficult period, that is a hundred words the markers cannot credit. Set the scene fast, then show yourself deciding.

For the wider marking system, the nine behaviours and how grade bands change the markers, read our guide to how behaviour answers are scored.

Frequently asked questions